Tiny A/B Test vs Optimizely
Comparing two A/B testing solutions: Stupid simple A/B testing for landing pages vs Enterprise experimentation platform
| Feature | Tiny A/B Test | Optimizely |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Free (100 servings/day) / $$29/month (unlimited) | Custom pricing (typically $50k+/year) |
| Script Size | <5KB | ~100KB+ |
| Setup Time | Minutes - copy/paste script | Complex, requires implementation team |
| Real-time Results | ||
| Segmentation | ||
| Domains | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Best For | Startups, indie hackers, and small businesses who need fast, affordable landing page optimization | Large enterprises with dedicated optimization teams and budgets of $50k+/year |
Tiny A/B Test
Stupid simple A/B testing for landing pages
Pricing
- free: Free (100 servings/day)
- pro: $29/month (unlimited)
Pros
- Extremely lightweight (<5KB) - no performance impact
- Setup in minutes, not days or weeks
- Affordable pricing for startups and small businesses
- Real-time results dashboard
- Country-level segmentation
- No vendor lock-in or complex contracts
- Unlimited domains and variations
Cons
- Focused on landing page A/B tests (not full-stack)
- No visual editor (edit your HTML directly)
- Newer product with smaller user base
- Less enterprise features than competitors
Optimizely
Enterprise experimentation platform
Pricing
- starter: Custom pricing (typically $50k+/year)
- enterprise: Custom pricing
Pros
- Enterprise-grade features and support
- Advanced targeting and personalization
- Robust analytics and reporting
- Multi-channel testing (web, mobile, server-side)
- Integrations with major marketing tools
Cons
- Extremely expensive for small businesses and startups
- Complex setup requires dedicated resources
- Overkill for simple landing page tests
- Heavy script impacts page performance
- Long sales cycle and implementation time
Ready to Start Testing?
Join startups and indie hackers who chose Tiny A/B Test for its simplicity, speed, and affordability.